Home  ›  How to Show the Album Art in Spotify Again

How to Show the Album Art in Spotify Again

Written By Saturday 23 April 2022 Add Comment Edit

Criticism of music streaming service

Spotify, a music streaming visitor, has attracted pregnant criticism since its 2006 launch,[ane] mainly over creative person compensation. Dissimilar physical sales or downloads, which pay artists a fixed price per song or album sold, Spotify pays royalties based on the artist's "market place share"—the number of streams for their songs equally a proportion of full songs streamed on the service. Spotify distributes approximately lxx% of its total acquirement to rights holders, who then pay artists based on their individual agreements. Multiple artists have criticised the policy, most notably Thom Yorke and Taylor Swift, who temporarily withdrew their music from the service.

Spotify faces particular scrutiny due to its free service tier, which allows users to listen free with advertisements betwixt tracks. The tier has led to a variety of major anthology releases being delayed or withdrawn from the service. Spotify claims information technology benefits the industry by migrating users away from piracy and less monetized platforms and encouraging them to upgrade to paid accounts. Record labels keep a large corporeality of Spotify earnings.

Spotify has also attracted media attention for several security breaches, as well every bit for controversial moves including a meaning modify to its privacy policy, "pay-for-play" practices based on receiving money from labels for putting specific songs on pop playlists, and allegedly creating "imitation artists" for prominent playlist placement, which Spotify denies.

Business organization practices [edit]

Allegations of unfair artist compensation [edit]

Spotify, together with the music streaming industry in general, faces criticism from some artists and producers, claiming they are existence unfairly compensated for their piece of work as music sales refuse and music streaming increases.[two] Unlike physical sales or legal downloads, which pay artists a fixed price per song or anthology sold, Spotify pays royalties based on their "marketplace share"—the number of streams for their songs every bit a proportion of total songs streamed on the service. Spotify distributes approximately 70% of its full revenue to rights-holders, who volition then pay artists based on their individual agreements.[three]

The variable (and some say unsustainable)[4] nature of this compensation, has led to criticism. In a 2009 Guardian article, Helienne Lindvall wrote about why "major labels beloved Spotify", writing that the labels receive xviii% of shares from the streaming company—something that artists themselves never really go. She further wrote that "On Spotify, it seems, artists are non equal. There are indie labels that, as opposed to the majors and Merlin members, receive no advance, receive no minimum per stream, and but get a fifty% share of ad revenue on a pro-rata basis (which so far has amounted to next to zippo)."[5] In 2009, Swedish musician Magnus Uggla pulled his music from the service, stating that after six months he had earned "what a mediocre busker could earn in a day".[6]

Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet reported in 2009 that the record label Racing Junior earned only NOK 19 ($iii.00 USD) after their artists had been streamed over 55,100 times.[7] Co-ordinate to an infographic by David McCandless, an creative person on Spotify would need over four 1000000 streams per month to earn the U.S. minimum monthly wage of $1,160.[viii] In October 2011, U.S. contained characterization Projekt Records stated: "In the world I want to live in, I envision artists fairly compensated for their creations, because nosotros (the audience) believe in the value of what artists create. The artist's passion, dedication, and expression is respected and rewarded. Spotify is NOT a service that does this. Projekt will non be office of this unprincipled concept."[9]

In March 2012, Patrick Carney of The Black Keys said that "Spotify isn't fair to artists", and further commented that streaming services "are condign more than popular, but it however isn't at a point where you're able to replace royalties from record sales with the royalties from streams. For a band that makes a living selling music, it's not at a betoken where it's feasible for united states."[11] Replying to Spotify lath member Sean Parker'south claim that Spotify would make more money for the music industry than iTunes, Carney said: "That guy has $2 billion that he fabricated from figuring out means to steal royalties from artists, and that'due south the bottom line. You can't really trust anybody like that." In May 2012, British Theatre vocalizer and Biffy Clyro touring guitarist Mike Vennart stated: "I'd sooner people stole my piece of work than stream it from [Spotify]. They pay the artists virtually nothing. Literally pennies per calendar month. Yet they brand a killing. They've forced the sales way down in sure territories, which wouldn't be and then bad if the bands really got paid."[12]

Vocalizer David Byrne of Talking Heads criticized streaming services such as Spotify in October 2013, writing: "If artists have to rely almost exclusively on the income from these services, they'll exist out of work within a yr." Byrne ended his piece by admitting "I don't accept an answer."[13] In March 2014, American funk band Vulfpeck exposed a loophole in Spotify'southward royalty calculation model. The band created an album titled Sleepify, which consisted solely of silence. The band asked users to stream the album on a loop while they slept to increase the amount of coin earned. The album was pulled by Spotify in Apr 2014, citing unspecified service violation. Vulfpeck had accumulated enough streams to result in effectually $20,000 in royalties before the anthology was pulled.[14] [15] [sixteen] In July 2015, Neil Immature removed almost all of his music from Spotify and other streaming services, citing low audio quality every bit the primary reason. He stated that he did not recall his fans deserved the low quality they were receiving, and said it was bad for his music.[17] Young'due south music later returned to Spotify and other streaming services.[18]

Worldwide, thirty.000 musicians have joined the system UnionOfMusicians (UMAW). UMAW organized protests in 31 cities in March 2021 and its entrada #JusticeAtSpotify is demanding a bounty of 1 cent per stream.[nineteen] Moreover, they are asking for a fairer redistribution system, as smaller artists are disproportionately disadvantaged on Spotify.[19]

On 29 June 2021, Digital Music News released an article titled "Spotify Executive Calls Artist 'Entitled' for Requesting Payment of 1 Penny Per Stream". The article covers the story of a Spotify Inventor Jim Anderson, who on 14 June 2019 responded in front of a live audience to the full general allegation of unfair compensation when confronted about information technology past Ashley Jana, a producer/vocalizer/songwriter who happened to be recording the event.[20] Jim Anderson was described on the Sync Summit June 2019 Agenda every bit "The human who congenital out the system architecture of Spotify".[21] Ashley Jana released excerpts from his response in the form of an audio recording on YouTube on 26 November 2020.[22] Some of the comments that Jim Anderson fabricated were the following: "And so, maybe I should get downwards the entitlement route now? Or should I wait a few minutes?", "The problem is this. Spotify was created to solve a problem. The trouble was this - piracy and music distribution. The problem was to get artists' music out there to solve a problem. The trouble was non to pay people money", and "I call back that Taylor Swift doesn't need .000001 cent more a stream". Following the release of the Digital Music News article, Business Insider also released their own take on the story with their article titled "Taylor Swift 'doesn't need' to earn streaming royalties co-ordinate to a sometime Spotify boss who said the company is a distribution platform that wasn't built to pay artists coin."[23] Business Insider reported that "Spotify declined Business Insider's request for annotate".

Back up to Spotify [edit]

In June 2012, Charles Caldas, CEO of the Merlin Network (a representative body for over 10,000 contained labels), clarified that Spotify pays royalties to the music labels, and not the artists. According to Caldas, the payments Merlin's labels received from Spotify rose 250 pct from the year ending March 2011 to the year ending March 2012, while at the fourth dimension, the revenue per user was "the highest it has been since the launch of the service". Caldas said that Merlin had observed "consistent, ongoing growth on revenue per user, revenue per stream, and the total revenue" that Spotify generates for the labels it represents. "The thing about 'Spotify doesn't pay artists enough'—Spotify doesn't pay artists... They pay labels", said Caldas.[24]

Caldas also highlighted the outcome of time lag for artists, as they are not gaining an impression of Spotify's condition at the time they receive their payments. They are "getting reporting quarterly, or six-monthly, on sales that happened 6 months ago." Caldas explained that "royalty statements could be a year former".[24]

In February 2015, Music Business Worldwide reported on a French study between music trade trunk SNEP and EY that concluded that major labels kept 73% of Spotify Premium payouts, while writers/publishers received 16%, and artists received 11%.[25] Mike Masnick of Techdirt wrote: "Sure, in the past, it may take been reasonable for the labels to take on big fees for distribution, but that'south when information technology meant manufacturing tons of plastic and vinyl, and then shipping it to thousands of record stores around the globe. In this case, there'due south no manufacturing, and distribution is an "upload" button."[26]

Spotify's "artist-in-residence" assistance [edit]

In February 2012, Forbes reported on "Spotify's surreptitious weapon": musician D. A. Wallach, member of the band Chester French and former Harvard classmate of Mark Zuckerberg. He acts as Spotify'due south "creative person-in-residence" and helps Spotify "brainstorm artist-friendly applications that can be carved from the gusher of data it collects". 1 such application includes geographical data of which cities listen to artists' music the most as suitable bout locations. He told Forbes:[27]

Nosotros're working very carefully to make Spotify the almost artist-friendly visitor that has ever existed. ... Nosotros're very interested in a high level of letting artists straight connect to their fans and manage that relationship and evangelize value to their fans, and vice versa. We want to do that really elegantly, at a scale that's never existed before.

In a June interview with Hypebot, Wallach reported that $180 million of royalties was paid out in 2011 and 70% of Spotify'south revenue consisted of royalty payments. Spotify'southward growth meant that the per-stream royalty rate doubled betwixt the service'south inception and mid-2012. He said that, at the time, compared to iTunes, the average listener spends $sixty annually on music, whereas Spotify Premium users spend twice that corporeality. According to Wallach in 2012: "The growth of the platform is proportional to the royalty pay out, and since inception, we've already doubled the effective per play charge per unit."[28]

Creative person withdrawals [edit]

Thom Yorke [edit]

In July 2013, Radiohead vocaliser Thom Yorke and producer Nigel Godrich removed their ring Atoms for Peace and Yorke's solo music from Spotify. In a tweet, Yorke stated: "Make no error—new artists yous detect on #Spotify volition not go paid. Meanwhile, shareholders will presently be rolling in it. Simples." Godrich stated: "[Streaming] cannot work as a mode of supporting new artists' piece of work. Spotify and the like either take to accost that fact and change the model for new releases, or else all new music producers should exist assuming and vote with their anxiety."[29]

In an October 2013 interview with Mexican website Sopitas, Yorke said: "I experience like as musicians, nosotros need to fight the Spotify thing. I feel that, in some ways, what'due south happening in the mainstream is the last gasp of the erstwhile manufacture. Once that does finally die, which it will, something else will happen." He described Spotify equally "the concluding desperate fart of a dying corpse".[30] Spotify responded in a argument that it was "still in the early stages of a long-term projection that's already having a hugely positive effect on artists and new music", and that information technology is "100% committed to making Spotify the most artist-friendly music service possible, and are constantly talking to artists and managers about how Spotify can assist build their career".[31] In 2015, Brian Message, partner at Radiohead's management company Courtyard Management,[32] stated that he disagreed with Yorke, noting that Spotify pays seventy percent of its revenue dorsum to the music industry. He said that "Thom's upshot was that the pipage has become so jammed ... We encourage all of our artists to take a long-term approach ... Plan for the long term, empathize that it'southward a tough game."[33]

On 17 June 2016, Radiohead's 9th album, A Moon Shaped Puddle, was made bachelor on Spotify, six weeks later on it was released on paid-for streaming services including Apple Music and Tidal and Deezer. Spotify had been in "advanced discussions" with Radiohead'southward management and label to make A Moon Shaped Pool the start album available exclusively to Spotify's paid subscribers, just no understanding was reached. Spotify spokesperson Jonathan Prince stated: "Some of the approaches nosotros explored with Radiohead were new, and nosotros ultimately decided that we couldn't deliver on those approaches technologically in time for the album's release schedule."[34] In Rainbows, the only other Radiohead album not previously available on Spotify, was added on 10 June 2016.[35] Yorke's solo cloth and Atoms for Peace were re-added in Dec 2017.[36]

Taylor Swift [edit]

Taylor Swift, pictured in 2017, temporarily removed her music from Spotify.

In July 2014, Taylor Swift wrote an article in The Wall Street Journal in which she stated: "Music is art, and art is important and rare. Of import, rare things are valuable. Valuable things should be paid for. Information technology's my stance that music should not exist costless, and my prediction is that private artists and their labels volition someday determine what an album'due south toll bespeak is. I promise they don't underestimate themselves or undervalue their art."[37] On three Nov 2014, Swift removed her discography from Spotify. Swift had previously delayed the streaming of her 2012 album Cherry-red.[38] Swift stated: "I'thou not willing to contribute my life's work to an experiment that I don't feel fairly compensates the writers, producers, artists, and creators of this music. And I just don't agree with perpetuating the perception that music has no value and should be gratuitous."[39]

Spotify launched a social media campaign to persuade Swift to return and, in a statement on its website, claimed that nearly 16 million of over 40 million users had played her music in the preceding 30-twenty-four hours period.[xl] Spotify CEO Daniel Ek wrote: "Taylor Swift is absolutely right; music is art, fine art has real value, and artists deserve to be paid for information technology. ... At our current size, payouts for a top creative person like Taylor Swift (before she pulled her itemize) are on track to exceed $6 meg a year."[41] Withal, Scott Borchetta, CEO of Big Machine Records (Swift's label), disputed those figures, and claimed that Swift had received "less than $500,000" in the past 12 months of domestic streaming of her songs. A Spotify spokesperson disputed this, telling Fourth dimension that the total payout for Swift's streaming was $2 million globally.[42]

According to Ben Popper of The Verge, Borchetta's figure of $500,000 only covered Spotify'due south payment for Taylor Swift streams in the US, which is non its largest market place. Regarding the $half-dozen million effigy, Popper wrote: "As more people sign upwardly for Spotify and Taylor Swift continues her march towards space popularity, the amount she is getting paid is increasing. [Ek] took her trend line and ran it forward a year to get to the highest possible number he could quote."[43]

Co-ordinate to Borchetta, the corporeality Swift earned from streaming her videos on Vevo was greater than the payout she received from Spotify. He told Time: "The facts show that the music manufacture was much better off before Spotify striking these shores ... Don't forget this is for the almost successful artist in music today. What nearly the residue of the artists out in that location struggling to make a career? Over the last year, what Spotify has paid is the equivalent of less than 50,000 albums sold."[42]

Borchetta said in a February 2015 interview that Swift's catalog would exist permitted on a streaming service "that understands the dissimilar needs that nosotros [Swift and Big Machine Records] have," whereby "the choice to be [on the free, ad-supported tier] or not" is provided. Borchetta argued that Swift's musical oeuvre is "arguably the most important current catalog in that location is", and stated that the streaming issue is "about each individual artist, and the real mission here is to bring ... attention to it."[44] In November 2014, Borchetta stated in a radio interview that "If this fan went and purchased the record, CD, iTunes, wherever, and then their friends go, 'Why did you pay for it? It's free on Spotify', nosotros're being completely disrespectful to that superfan."[45]

In December 2015, a homemade release of Swift's song, "I Knew You Were Trouble", appeared on Spotify credited to Welsh stone band Lostprophets. The release was removed three days later on.[46]

In an interview with Music Calendar week in November 2016, Spotify's United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland head of content programming George Ergatoudis said: "I've got every reason to exist very optimistic Taylor Swift volition exist coming back to Spotify. I'm not maxim it's washed, just the indications are good, put it like that".[47] [48]

Swift collaborated with Zayn Malik for the song "I Don't Wanna Live Forever" for the flick 50 Shades Darker. The vocal, released in Dec 2016, was withheld from Spotify for ane week later its original release on competing streaming services.[49]

In June 2017, it was announced that Swift's full catalog would exist released on all streaming services, including Spotify. On social media, Swift'southward direction team stated: "In commemoration of 1989 selling over 10 million albums worldwide and the RIAA's 100 one thousand thousand vocal certification, Taylor wants to give thanks her fans by making her entire back catalog available to all streaming services."[l] Rolling Stone questioned whether the move to permit her music on all streaming services was permanent.[51] On 25 August 2017, Swift released her single "Expect What You Made Me Do"; it was made available on Spotify immediately following release.[52] However, her sixth studio album, Reputation, featuring "Look What You Fabricated Me Do", was withheld from all streaming services subsequently its 10 Nov release date,[53] [54] being made available for streaming on 1 December 2017.[55] All releases by Swift since, including Lover, Folklore, Evermore, the re-recorded Fearless and Ruby-red were all released to Spotify immediately post-obit their release.

Content withdrawals and delays [edit]

Spotify states in its support pages that: "We desire all the world's music on Spotify. However, some artists and tracks are not currently available. Sometimes agreements can't exist reached with the artist or characterization, or a alter may happen in music ownership."[56] Furthermore, in its apps, Spotify states a message for unavailable content: "The creative person or their representatives have decided not to release this album on Spotify. We are working on it and hope they will alter their mind soon."

In December 2015, Coldplay withheld A Head Full of Dreams from Spotify until one week after its release, citing that all music on Spotify is available to both paid and costless users.[57] [58] [59] Coldplay previously delayed their anthology Ghost Stories from all streaming services for four months after CD, vinyl and download release,[60] and did the same with its earlier album Mylo Xyloto.[61]

Beyoncé'due south cocky-titled album was not available until 24 November 2014, almost a year later its original release.[62] Adele's 21 was not initially bachelor on Spotify, every bit Adele wanted Spotify to brand her anthology available to paid subscribers only, but not to gratuitous users. Spotify declined her offer to avert creating separate catalogues for subscribers and non-subscribers.[63] The anthology, originally released in January 2011, became available to stream 17 months later on in June 2012.[64] In Nov 2015, the vocalist confirmed that her new album, 25, wouldn't be available for streaming on any service.[65] [66] In a series of interviews with Time, Adele stated: "I know that streaming music is the future, but information technology's not the only way to consume music. ... I can't pledge allegiance to something that I don't know how I feel about still."[67] However, the album was made bachelor for streaming seven months subsequently, in June 2016.[68]

Several bands from the 1960s and 1970s delayed their work beingness made available on Spotify or any streaming services. Until the end of 2013, Led Zeppelin's music was not available, earlier the parties reached an agreement in December.[69] In 2015, AC/DC and The Beatles allowed their music on streaming services.[70] [71] In 2018, many songs from the anthology Go Happy!! past Elvis Costello and the Attractions were removed from the site, including "New Amsterdam" and many others.

Icelandic singer Björk initially chose non to release her album Vulnicura on Spotify, maxim: "This streaming affair simply does non feel right. I don't know why, merely it just seems insane. ... To work on something for 2 or iii years and then merely, 'Oh, here it is for complimentary.' Information technology's not about the coin; it's about respect, you know? Respect for the arts and crafts and the amount of work you put into it."[72] [73]

In February 2017, Prince's music produced under the Warner Bros. label, including the albums 1999, Purple Rain, Muddy Heed, and Sign o' the Times, became available on Spotify and other streaming services.[74] [75]

In April 2017, rapper Jay Z, function-owner of streaming service Tidal, pulled his music catalog from Spotify and Apple tree Music. This was the third time the artist removed his albums from competing services, following the release of his debut album Reasonable Doubt, and after The Blueprint.[76] [77] [78] On iv December 2019, Jay Z's unabridged catalogue returned to Spotify later a ii year absence in honour of his 50th birthday.[79]

In Feb 2019, Spotify premiered in India without the catalogue of Warner Music Group and its publishing segmentation Warner/Chappell Music. Warner Music sued Spotify for using a statutory license, which applied to radio stations.[80] [81] In January 2020, Spotify signed a global publishing deal with Warner/Chappell.[82] On 1 Apr 2020, Warner Music and Spotify ended the dispute by signing a global deal for the visitor'southward recording artists.[83]

On 2 August 2019, progressive metal band Tool's catalog premiered on Spotify and other digital services for the beginning fourth dimension.[84]

In Jan 2021, Spotify removed nearly 750,000 tracks from its catalogue for having fraudulent stream totals. Distributor DistroKid has offered a counter-notification procedure for artists whose music was removed from Spotify.[85]

On one March 2021, due to the expiring distribution bargain, Thou-pop songs and releases distributed past Kakao M were removed from Spotify. Co-ordinate to the statement released by Kakao Thousand, Spotify were claimed as the political party who chose non to renew the deal.[86] On 11 March 2021, Kakao M renewed its distribution deal with Spotify.[87]

On v Baronial 2021, Blackground Records partnered with Empire Distribution to re-release almost of its discography, most notably the catalogue of R&B singer Aaliyah.[88] On twenty August 2021, Aaliyah'south 2d album, Ane in a One thousand thousand, debuted on Spotify. Earlier 2021, all of Aaliyah's Blackground albums (except for her 1994 debut album Age Ain't Null simply a Number) had never been released digitally because her uncle/manager, Barry Hankerson, had permit those releases become out of impress.[89]

In December 2021, Spotify removed albums past hundreds of comedians because of unpaid limerick royalties. The comedians are represented past Spoken Giants, an administration company for spoken-give-and-take compositions.[90]

De La Soul, Garth Brooks and Joanna Newsom are some of the few major artists withal missing from Spotify.[91] In De La Soul's example, the group did not believe that their label Tommy Male child Records was offering a fair deal, as well as the price of re-immigration the samples.[92] Brooks has an exclusive bargain with Amazon Music,[93] while Newsom'southward main catalogue is non bachelor on Spotify. She said that the streaming platform is "the banana of the music industry" and calls it "the villainous conduce of major labels".[94] The simply song bachelor on Spotify by Newsom is her cover of The Muppet Show's theme song, from the soundtrack of the 2011 picture show The Muppets.

Controversial policies and alleged behaviors [edit]

2015 privacy policy ambiguity [edit]

In August 2015, Spotify inverse its terms and privacy policy, expanding Spotify'due south lawful admission to media and location data stored on user devices. Initial concerns were raised about the policy being "far too broad without examples or vital context and particular effectually the information gathering the service is implementing", something Ek ascribed to poor communication from Spotify about the implications of the policy change. The Verge has criticised Wired's coverage (which was republished by Gizmodo) to the policy change, citing a lack of context in their reporting in terms of declining to mention opt-out and explicit consent clauses, describing it equally an "overreaction", as "FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt)", and fearmongering.[95]

In response to concerns about the change, Ek tweeted a list of specific scenarios when this data is needed. For example, he described that access to photos is needed to upload playlist covers, and contacts for sharing tracks.[95] Afterward, Ek published a post on the Spotify blog explicitly list out the times when Spotify may ask to access this information, apologising for poor communication, and reiterating a "100 pct commit[ment] to protecting" user privacy.[96] [97]

Wired has since removed its coverage of the policy modify.[98]

Pay for Play practise and "Discovery Way" [edit]

In August 2015, Billboard reported that Spotify was amid the streaming services influenced past "pay for play", in which labels pay for songs to be placed on popular playlists followed by many users. Daniel Glass, executive of Glassnote Records, stated that playlist promotion was "a very, very large deal". Billboard referenced an v August practice, in which Universal Music Grouping hired Jay Frank as its Senior Vice President of Global Streaming Marketing, followed past an investment in Frank's marketing house DigMark, "an innovator" in pay-for-play practices that charges clients U.s.$2,000 for a six-calendar week campaign. The price goes up for playlists followed by more users, upwards to US$10,000. "For a while, Spotify didn't take a view", on the practise, according to a music label executive, just its so-new Terms of Service agreements would "[take] a stand against commercializing accounts and playlists by rank-and-file users", also as prohibit the practice of "accepting any bounty, financial or otherwise, to influence ... the content included on an business relationship or playlist". However, Billboard wrote that "policing, let solitary enforcing, these terms could be difficult", adding that loopholes tin all the same exist exploited to continue the practice.[99]

In June 2018, allegations resurfaced after the release of Drake'south new album Scorpion. According to users the songs of the artist were included in various playlists, some that were unrelated to the genre of their songs, such as gospel, ambient music and "best of British". Heavy criticism followed, with reports of some paying Spotify subscribers demanding refunds or unsubscribing. 1 of them reported to call the Federal Trade Committee to report advertising fraud.[100] [101] [102] [103]

2016–17: "Imitation artists" controversy [edit]

In August 2016, Music Business Worldwide reported that Spotify had begun paying producers to create music and placing the tracks on highly followed and pop playlists on the service. The production of the music, reportedly paid for by Spotify, was published on the service using fake artist names, and the motivation backside the practice reportedly due to creating tracks to "quality control" the mood of specific playlists and gain more favorable royalty rates than major and contained labels offer. Nonetheless, the implications of the practise meant certain rightsholders who normally earned decent payouts from being featured on such playlists were excluded.[104] Later being mentioned in an article by Vulture in July 2017,[105] a Spotify spokesperson told Billboard that "We practice not and accept never created 'faux' artists and put them on Spotify playlists. Categorically untrue, full terminate [...] We pay royalties—sound and publishing—for all tracks on Spotify, and for everything we playlist. We practice not own rights, we're not a label, all our music is licensed from rightsholders and we pay them—we don't pay ourselves".[106] However, in another report, the Music Business Worldwide publication discussed the situation, including the artists' lack of social media profiles, lack of managers, lawyers and industry relationships, the listing of owning all their own rights, the lack of appearance on other streaming services, Spotify's denial to comment regarding questions of the artists' frequent placement on playlists, royalty rates and recommendation origins, and bearding comments from "very senior figures in the music business" with declared noesis of the practise. The publication listed fifty of the acme artists under suspicion, and asked them to contact the publication to verify their authenticity, adding that "Nosotros're pretty sure A&R teams from across the globe would dear to hear about artists with no online presence who accept managed to rack up millions of Spotify plays with their showtime few tracks".[107]

2017–18: Hate Content & Hateful Deport policy [edit]

In August 2017, Spotify announced that it would remove music that promotes white nationalism from its catalogue.[108]

In May 2018, Spotify attracted criticism for its "Hate Content & Hateful Conduct policy" that removed the music of R. Kelly and XXXTentacion from its editorial and algorithmic playlists considering "When we expect at promotion, we look at bug effectually mean bear, where y'all have an artist or another creator who has washed something off-platform that is so specially out of line with our values, egregious, in a fashion that it becomes something that we don't desire to acquaintance ourselves with". R. Kelly has faced accusations of sexual corruption since the 1990s, being the subject field of numerous allegations of sexual abuse and misconduct, frequently with underage girls, while XXXTentacion was on trial for charges of false imprisonment, witness tampering, and aggravated battery of a pregnant victim.[109] This policy was revoked in June because the company accounted the original wording to be too "vague"; they stated that "Across all genres, our role is not to regulate artists. Therefore, we are moving away from implementing a policy effectually creative person bear".[110]

In Apr 2019, Spotify completely erased the discography of Blood on the Dance Floor on the grounds of detest content. This happened in the wake of accusations made by nearly ii dozen women regarding statutory rape by lead singer Dahvie Vanity.[111] While the catalogues of Lostprophets and Gary Glitter are however available on Spotify. Lostprophets' main discography and singles like Last Train Dwelling house and Rooftops (A Liberation Broadcast) are nowhere to exist institute on Spotify due to the aftermath of Ian Watkins' arrest of child pornography and rape, which lead to the ring's dissolution. As well, it is impossible to create an artist station for Gary Glitter.[112]

Removal of podcast content [edit]

In Apr 2021, Spotify announced the removal of 42 The Joe Rogan Feel episodes from their catalog including interviews with Alex Jones, Bulletproof Coffee founder Dave Asprey expressing anti-aging claims of his product, crude jokes, and interviews with Chris D'Elia. In May 2020, Spotify paid an estimated $100 million for the exclusive rights to the podcast library.[113]

Security problems [edit]

2009 security alienation [edit]

In March 2009, Spotify warned users that a security flaw discovered and fixed in December 2008 was more serious than previously idea, having compromised the password hashes of private users in Spotify's pre-December 2008 customer base of operations, also equally potentially "registration information such as your email address, birth date, gender, postal code and billing receipt details". Credit card information was not exposed, due to being handled by a secure third-party provider. Spotify brash users to alter their passwords, especially in cases where the aforementioned password was used for multiple sites.[114] [115]

2011 PC malware reports [edit]

In March 2011, Spotify temporarily removed brandish advertising on its reckoner software, after reports from users on the gratuitous service tier that a malicious advert had infected their systems. And so-named security firm Websense stated that the attack used the Blackhole exploit kit.[116] Spotify said in a argument that "Users with anti-virus software will take been protected", and "We sincerely apologise to any users affected. Nosotros'll go along working hard to ensure this does not happen again and that our users enjoy Spotify securely and in confidence."[117]

2014 security breach [edit]

In May 2014, Spotify announced it had been hacked, but stated that merely 1 user's information was accessed. It released a new Spotify app on the Android platform, replacing the former app, with Spotify chief technology officer Oskar Stål writing in a blog postal service that the upgrade was "a necessary precaution" and that no action for apps on other platforms were necessary.[118] [119]

Missing or inadequate application features [edit]

Lack of explicit content filter [edit]

Spotify is one of the few music streaming services that do not allow users to filter explicit content, which Rick Broida of CNET writes "may forestall users from opting into Spotify'south Family Programme subscription offering".[120] Nonetheless, in April 2018, Spotify added the explicit filter for lyrics to mobile and tablet versions, merely even so displays explicit album art to all users.[121] As of 2021, there is a setting for explicit music for Windows.

Limit on music library [edit]

Spotify used to limit users' music libraries to 10,000 songs.[122] [123] This acquired negative publicity on several occasions and "years of user complaints".[122] Derek Mead of Motherboard wrote in March 2016 that the limit was "insane", and suggested that Spotify, later on raising "another billion dollars" in funding, should "fix the service's most asinine limitation".[124] Chris Welch of The Verge wrote in May 2017 that "It's time for Spotify to terminate capping how much music y'all can save", further questioning "Why is at that place such an arbitrary cap?" Welch'southward commodity besides highlighted the "thousands of votes from users" on Spotify's customs forum request for a higher limit, and attached a reply from a company representative, stating "At the moment, we don't have plans to extend the "Your Music" limit. The reason is considering less than 1% of users reach it. The current limit ensures a great experience for 99% of users instead of an "OK" feel for 100%".[122]

On 26 May 2020, Spotify relented on their determination and decided to non limit user music libraries to 10,000 songs & albums. The new system just applies to the ability to salve songs and albums to user'due south Spotify library. Private playlists are still express to 10,000 songs, and users can still but download upward to 10,000 songs on each of their 5 unlike devices for offline listening.[123]

Other criticism [edit]

"Scorpion SZN" promotion [edit]

On 27 June 2018, Spotify held a "takeover" promotion (dubbed "Scorpion SZN") to promote the release of Drake's fifth studio anthology Scorpion. During the promotion, many of the service's curated playlists had their cover art modified to include photos of Drake, fifty-fifty if the playlist's topic was not associated with Drake's music. The campaign faced criticism from some users, who felt that it was excessive (especially to users not necessarily interested in Drake's music), and contradictory to Spotify Premium being promoted as an advertising-free service. It was reported that some users had successfully received refunds subsequently lament about the promotion.[125] [126]

Ministry of Sound copyright lawsuit [edit]

In September 2013, Ministry of Audio sued Spotify, alleging that user playlists mimicking the rails listings of their compilation albums were infringing on the copyrights of the albums themselves (citing the skill and effort in their compilation).[127] [128]

In 2014, the two parties reached a settlement, under which Spotify agreed to restrict the power to search for or follow the infringing playlists.[129]

Misinformation [edit]

In 2020, Spotify received criticism from anti-misinformation groups when conspiracy theorist Alex Jones appeared on The Joe Rogan Experience.[130]

In Jan 2022, 270 scientists, physicians, professors, doctors, and healthcare workers wrote an open letter of the alphabet to Spotify expressing business over "false and societally harmful assertions" on The Joe Rogan Experience and asked Spotify to "establish a articulate and public policy to moderate misinformation on its platform." The 270 signatories took issue with Joe Rogan "broadcasting misinformation, particularly regarding the COVID-19 pandemic", and more specifically "a highly controversial episode featuring guest Dr. Robert Malone (#1757). The episode has been criticized for promoting baseless conspiracy theories", including "an unfounded theory that societal leaders have 'hypnotized' the public." The signatories farther assert that "Dr. Malone is 1 of two recent JRE guests who has compared pandemic policies to the Holocaust. These deportment are not but objectionable and offensive, merely besides medically and culturally dangerous." The signatories also annotation that Malone was suspended from Twitter "for spreading misinformation about COVID-19".[131] [132]

On 25 January 2022, Neil Young demanded that his music be removed from Spotify, over the Joe Rogan COVID-19 misinformation.[133] The following solar day, while siding with Rogan, Spotify appear that it volition remove all of Young'southward music at his request. While Spotify regretted their decision, they hoped that Spotify would "welcome him back soon."[134] On 28 January, Joni Mitchell appear that she will remove her music from Spotify in support of Young.[135] On 29 Jan, James Edgeless joked on Twitter that he would release his music on Spotify unless they remove The Joe Rogan Experience podcast off the platform, while Nils Lofgren announced he will pull his music off from Spotify in support of Immature.[136] [137] [138] Podcaster and author Brené Brown also appear that she will not release any Spotify-exclusive podcasts until further notice.[139] Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, who signed a multi-twelvemonth partnership with Spotify, stated that since Apr 2021 they had likewise begun "expressing concerns" over COVID-19 misinformation on the platform.[140] On 30 January, Spotify CEO Daniel Ek announced that Spotify will place advisory warnings on podcasts that discusses COVID-xix on the platform which will redirect to an data hub on COVID-xix.[141]

Funding Defence force Technology [edit]

On nine November 2021, Spotify CEO Daniel Ek announced that Prima Materia, his investment visitor, was altruistic €100 one thousand thousand (Us$115 million) into Helsing, a European defense AI visitor. Ek also joined Helsing's lath along with its co-founders Torsten Reil, Gundbert Scherf and Niklas Köhler.[142] Helsing, writes Connie Lin, "engineers software that pieces together a real-fourth dimension picture of an 'operational surroundings' by organizing unstructured data from multiple sensors on vehicles and systems—such every bit tanks, drones, or satellites—including video feeds, thermal imaging, and sonar and radar frequencies" which "could be valuable for military reconnaissance by helping officers assess battlefield gainsay situations or identify critical targets."[143] The German DJ and techno producer Skee Mask urged his virtually 17,000 Twitter followers non to give their "last penny to such a wealthy business that apparently prefers the development of warfare instead of actual progression in the music business." Co-ordinate to Sameer Gupta, a percussionist based in Brooklyn, New York, "All that money that's being taken from artists and musicians is beingness funneled to this," referring to Helsing. "I don't know a single musician who would always say, 'That's the function of music.'"[144]

References [edit]

  1. ^ "We've but just begun!". Spotify News. Spotify. seven October 2008. Archived from the original on 11 December 2017. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
  2. ^ Guttenberg, Steve (29 May 2014). "Is Spotify unfair to musicians?". CNET. CBS Interactive. Retrieved eight November 2016.
  3. ^ "How is Spotify contributing to the music concern?". Spotify. Archived from the original on 3 November 2014. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
  4. ^ Plaugic, Lizzie (vii December 2015). "Spotify's Year in Music shows just how little nosotros pay artists for their music". The Verge. Vocalisation Media. Retrieved 22 January 2017.
  5. ^ Lindvall, Helienne (17 August 2009). "Behind the music: The existent reason why the major labels beloved Spotify". The Guardian . Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  6. ^ Sidung, Erik (thirteen August 2009). "Uggla ursinnig över Spotify och Sony Music". Aftonbladet. Schibsted. Retrieved 23 Nov 2016.
  7. ^ Bryne, Snorre; Thorkildsen, Joakim (11 August 2009). "55 100 avspillinger ga 19 kroner". Dagbladet. Aller Media. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  8. ^ "How Much Do Music Artists Earn Online?". Information Is Cute. April 2010. Retrieved 23 Nov 2016.
  9. ^ Paul (3 October 2011). "Projekt Keeps Fighting; Calls Spotify an "Unprincipled Concept..."". Digital Music News. Archived from the original on 6 October 2011. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  10. ^ Perpetua, Matthew (13 December 2011). "Black Keys: Why We Won't Stream 'El Camino'". Rolling Stone. Wenner Media. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  11. ^ "And now to British Theatre". Screaming Silence. 17 May 2012. Archived from the original on 22 October 2013. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  12. ^ Byrne, David (11 Oct 2013). "David Byrne: 'The internet will suck all creative content out of the earth'". The Guardian . Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  13. ^ Abound, Kory (25 April 2014). "Don't Enjoy the Silence: Spotify Pulls Silent Publicity Stunt Album". Rolling Stone. Wenner Media. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  14. ^ Brown, Harley (26 April 2014). "Spotify Removes Vulfpeck'due south 'Sleepify'". Billboard. Prometheus Global Media. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  15. ^ Welch, Chris (seven May 2014). "Spotify removes silent album that earned indie ring $20,000". The Verge. Vocalization Media. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  16. ^ Roettgers, Janko (28 July 2015). "Two Weeks Afterward, Neil Young Finally Removes His Music From Spotify". Variety. Penske Media Corporation. Retrieved 23 Nov 2016.
  17. ^ "You Tin can Keep on Rockin' to Neil Young on Spotify and Apple Music — He's Back!". Vulture. New York Media, LLC. 4 November 2016. Retrieved 22 January 2017.
  18. ^ a b "Has Streaming Saved the Music Industry? - Tracks – Watch the total show". ARTE . Retrieved 28 October 2021. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  19. ^ "Spotify Exec Calls Artist 'Entitled' for Requesting One Penny Per Stream". Digital Music News. 30 June 2021. Retrieved 1 February 2022.
  20. ^ "Sync Summit NY 2019 Calendar". SyncSummit (in Danish). 26 May 2019. Retrieved i February 2022.
  21. ^ Youtube Video: "Spotify Inventor Calls Musicians Entitled"
  22. ^ Business Insider: "Taylor Swift 'doesn't need' to earn streaming royalties according to a onetime Spotify boss who said the company is a distribution platform that wasn't built to pay artists money"
  23. ^ a b Buskirk, Eliot Van (21 June 2012). "David Lowery Might Exist Right About Some Things, But He's Wrong Nigh Streaming, Money, and Artists". Evolver.fm. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
  24. ^ Ingham, Tim (3 February 2015). "Major labels keep 73% of Spotify Premium payouts – Report". Music Business organization Worldwide . Retrieved 17 December 2016.
  25. ^ Masnick, Mike (5 February 2015). "Aye, Major Record Labels Are Keeping Well-nigh All The Money They Get From Spotify, Rather Than Giving It To Artists". Techdirt. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
  26. ^ Greenburg, Zack (one February 2012). "Spotify's Secret Weapon". Forbes . Retrieved 17 December 2016.
  27. ^ Dahud, Hisham (21 June 2012). "Hypebot Interviews Spotify'due south "Hugger-mugger Weapon" – Creative person In Residence, D.A. Wallach". Hypebot. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
  28. ^ "Thom Yorke pulls albums from Spotify". BBC News. BBC. 15 July 2013. Retrieved xviii January 2017.
  29. ^ Dredge, Stuart (7 October 2013). "Thom Yorke calls Spotify 'the terminal desperate fart of a dying corpse'". The Guardian . Retrieved 18 Jan 2017.
  30. ^ Arthur, Charles (15 July 2013). "Thom Yorke blasts Spotify on Twitter as he pulls his music". The Guardian . Retrieved xviii January 2017.
  31. ^ Marshall, Alex (15 April 2016). "Radiohead have not yet decided whether to stream new album, says man from their management business firm". The Guardian . Retrieved 18 January 2017.
  32. ^ McGoogan, Cara (16 October 2015). "Brian Bulletin: Apple Music won't exist bigger than YouTube". Wired. Condé Nast. Retrieved 18 January 2017.
  33. ^ Forde, Eamonn (9 June 2016). "Exclusive: Spotify pulled out of Radiohead album-windowing plan". Music Marry. Retrieved xviii Jan 2017.
  34. ^ Brandle, Lars (10 June 2016). "Radiohead's 'In Rainbows' Is Bachelor on Spotify". Billboard. Prometheus Global Media. Retrieved eighteen January 2017.
  35. ^ Rossignol, Derrick (8 December 2017). "Thom Yorke'due south Solo Albums Are Finally Streaming On Spotify, Which He Famously Hates". Uproxx. Uproxx Media Grouping. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
  36. ^ Swift, Taylor (seven July 2014). "For Taylor Swift, the Futurity of Music Is a Love Story". The Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones & Company. Retrieved 23 December 2016. (subscription required)
  37. ^ Change, Charlotte (3 November 2014). "Taylor Swift Only Removed Her Music From Spotify". Time . Retrieved 23 December 2016.
  38. ^ Grow, Kory (vi Nov 2014). "Taylor Swift Shuns 'G Experiment' of Streaming Music". Rolling Rock. Wenner Media. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  39. ^ "On Taylor Swift's Decision To Remove Her Music from Spotify". Spotify. 3 Nov 2014. Archived from the original on 25 Dec 2016. Retrieved 23 Dec 2016.
  40. ^ Ek, Daniel (11 November 2014). "$2 Billion and Counting". Spotify. Archived from the original on 27 December 2016. Retrieved 23 December 2016.
  41. ^ a b Dickey, Jack (12 November 2014). "Taylor Swift'due south Spotify Paycheck Mystery". Time . Retrieved 23 Dec 2016.
  42. ^ Popper, Ben (thirteen November 2014). "Spotify says it paid Taylor Swift millions. Her label disagrees. Hither's the truth". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved 23 December 2016.
  43. ^ Newman, Melinda (five February 2015). "Taylor Swift'southward Label Dominate on Her Future, His Spotify Showdown and 'American Idol'". The Hollywood Reporter. Eldridge Industries. Retrieved 23 Dec 2016.
  44. ^ Knopper, Steve (eight Nov 2014). "Taylor Swift Pulled Music From Spotify for 'Superfan Who Wants to Invest,' Says Rep". Rolling Rock. Wenner Media. Retrieved 23 December 2016.
  45. ^ "Taylor Swift reappears on Spotify, only her music is credited to Lostprophets". the Guardian. vii December 2015.
  46. ^ Gumble, Daniel (28 November 2016). "George Ergatoudis: Taylor Swift and Adele set up for Spotify render". Music Calendar week. Intent Media. Retrieved 14 March 2017.
  47. ^ Harp, Justin (xxx Nov 2016). "Is Taylor Swift planning a render to Spotify?". Digital Spy. Hearst. Retrieved 14 March 2017.
  48. ^ Trust, Gary (sixteen December 2016). "Zayn & Taylor Swift'southward 'I Don't Wanna Alive Forever' Headed for Top 10 Hot 100 Debut". Billboard. Eldridge Industries. Retrieved xiv March 2017.
  49. ^ "Taylor Swift'southward Music Returning to Spotify & Other Streaming Services This night". Billboard. Eldridge Industries. 8 June 2017. Retrieved ix June 2017.
  50. ^ Legaspi, Althea (8 June 2017). "Taylor Swift Makes Full Catalog Available via Streaming Services". Rolling Stone. Wenner Media. Retrieved 8 June 2017.
  51. ^ Bruner, Raisa (25 August 2017). "Listen to Taylor Swift's New Song 'Wait What You Fabricated Me Practise'". Time . Retrieved 7 December 2017.
  52. ^ Shaw, Lucas (seven November 2017). "Taylor Swift Will Keep New Album From Streaming for a Week". Bloomberg Engineering science. Bloomberg. Retrieved 7 Dec 2017.
  53. ^ Weaver, Hilary (7 November 2017). "Taylor Swift Gives In, a Footling, to Spotify". Vanity Fair. Condé Nast. Retrieved seven December 2017.
  54. ^ Withers, Rachel (1 Dec 2017). "Fix for It? Taylor Swift's Reputation Is Now Streaming". Slate. The Slate Grouping. Retrieved vii Dec 2017.
  55. ^ "Content missing". Spotify. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  56. ^ Karp, Hannah (3 December 2015). "Coldplay to Headline Super Bowl Halftime Prove". The Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones & Company. Retrieved 24 December 2016. (subscription required)
  57. ^ Welch, Chris (3 Dec 2015). "Coldplay's new anthology won't exist on Spotify when information technology's released". The Verge. Phonation Media. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  58. ^ Cox, Jamieson (8 December 2015). "Coldplay'due south new album will be bachelor on Spotify this Fri, even for free users". The Verge. Vocalization Media. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  59. ^ Dredge, Stuart (23 September 2014). "Coldplay's Ghost Stories goes alive on Spotify and streaming music services". The Guardian . Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  60. ^ Indvik, Lauren (27 Oct 2011). "Why Coldplay and Adele Aren't Bringing New Albums to Spotify". Mashable . Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  61. ^ Luckerson, Victor (24 November 2014). "Beyoncé's Latest Anthology Is Finally on Spotify". Time . Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  62. ^ Carr, Austin (fifteen February 2012). "Why Spotify Turned Down Adele's 21". Fast Visitor. Mansueto Ventures. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  63. ^ Zirm, Jordan (27 June 2012). "Yous Can Now Stream Adele's "21" On Spotify". Complex. Verizon Hearst Media Partners. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  64. ^ Cox, Jamieson (19 November 2015). "Adele'due south new album 25 won't exist available on whatever streaming services". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  65. ^ Sisario, Ben (19 November 2015). "Adele Is Said to Refuse Streaming for 25". The New York Times . Retrieved 24 Dec 2016.
  66. ^ "Adele Talks Determination To Reject Streaming Her New Album". Time. 21 December 2015. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  67. ^ Cox, Jamieson (23 June 2016). "Adele'due south 25 is coming to Spotify tomorrow, 7 months later on its release". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  68. ^ Sisario, Ben (eleven December 2013). "Spotify Adds Led Zeppelin, and Turns Focus to Mobile". The New York Times . Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  69. ^ McCormick, Rich (29 June 2015). "Air conditioning/DC is putting its records on Spotify, Rdio, and Apple Music". The Verge. Phonation Media. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  70. ^ Kelion, Leo (23 Dec 2015). "Beatles music joins streaming services". BBC. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  71. ^ Brunner, Rob (26 Feb 2015). "Bjork On Keeping "Vulnicura" Off Spotify: "It's About Respect, You Know?"". Fast Company. Mansueto Ventures. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  72. ^ Kreps, Daniel (27 Feb 2015). "Bjork Keeping Vulnicura Off Spotify: 'It But Seems Insane'". Rolling Rock. Wenner Media. Retrieved 24 Dec 2016.
  73. ^ Flanagan, Andrew (9 February 2017). "It's Official: Prince Is Coming To Streaming This Sunday". NPR. Retrieved 11 February 2017.
  74. ^ Mullin, Joe (10 Feb 2017). "Prince'south music volition exist on Spotify and other services starting Sunday". Ars Technica. Condé Nast. Retrieved eleven February 2017.
  75. ^ Singleton, Micah (7 April 2017). "Jay Z'south itemize has been pulled from Apple Music and Spotify". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved x April 2017.
  76. ^ Morris, David Z. (eight April 2017). "Tidal Owner Jay-Z Pulls Every Album from Spotify, Apple Music". Fortune. Time Inc. Retrieved 10 Apr 2017.
  77. ^ Gensler, Andy (8 April 2017). "Jay Z Pulls Catalog From Spotify". Billboard. Eldridge Industries. Retrieved 10 Apr 2017.
  78. ^ Ricker, Thomas (4 December 2019). "Jay Z returns to Spotify". The Verge.
  79. ^ Kafka, Peter (28 February 2019). "Spotify and Warner Music are fighting, then Spotify users in India can't mind to Cardi B or Ed Sheeran". Recode. Vox Media.
  80. ^ Halperin, Shirley; Aswad, Jem (25 February 2019). "Spotify's Bharat Launch Hits Snag as Warner Music Sues". Diverseness. Penske Media Corperation.
  81. ^ Gurbaxani, Amit (14 January 2020). "Spotify and Warner Chappell End Long-Continuing Licensing Dispute In India". Billboard Pro. Billboard Media, LLC. (Penske Media Corporation).
  82. ^ Singh, Manish (one April 2020). "Spotify and Warner Music Grouping renew their global licensing deal, resolve issue in India". TechCrunch.
  83. ^ "Tool'due south Discography At present Available to Stream". Spin. ii August 2019.
  84. ^ "Spotify Removes Tens of Thousands of Indie Songs for 'Artificial Streams'". half-dozen January 2021.
  85. ^ "Spotify confirm hundreds of One thousand-pop releases removed from platform worldwide: "Information technology is our promise that this disruption will be temporary"". NME. 28 February 2021.
  86. ^ "Spotify reinstates K-Popular tracks from Kakao Amusement as companies attain global licensing deal". eleven March 2021.
  87. ^ "20 Years After Her Passing, Aaliyah's Music is Finally Coming to Streaming Services". Forbes.
  88. ^ "Aaliyah would have turned forty today...here's why we can't stream her music online". TheGrio. 16 Jan 2019.
  89. ^ Steele, Anne (4 December 2021). "Spotify Removes Some Comedians' Work From Streaming Service". The Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones & Company Inc.
  90. ^ "8 Artists Yous Nonetheless Can't Find on Whatsoever Major Streaming Service". Billboard.
  91. ^ "Legendary Hip-Hop Act De La Soul Protests Streaming Bargain for Its Classic Albums". Fortune.
  92. ^ "Garth Brooks On His Amazon Deal and Putting Radio Outset: 'Country Radio is the 800-Pound Gorilla'". Billboard.
  93. ^ Gordon, Jeremy (16 October 2015). "Joanna Newsom: "Spotify Is the Banana of the Music Industry. Information technology Just Gives Off a Fume"". Pitchfork.
  94. ^ a b Warren, Tom (21 August 2015). "Spotify'southward new privacy policy generates unnecessary outrage". The Verge . Retrieved 26 October 2020. {{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  95. ^ Welch, Chris (21 August 2015). "Spotify CEO apologizes for controversial new privacy policy". The Verge . Retrieved 26 October 2020. {{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  96. ^ Ek, Daniel (21 August 2015). "Sad". Spotify News. Archived from the original on 9 March 2018. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  97. ^ Gottsergon, Gordon (twenty August 2015). "Y'all Tin can't Do Squat About Spotify'southward Eerie New Privacy Policy (UPDATED)". Wired . Retrieved 26 Oct 2020. {{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  98. ^ Peoples, Glenn (nineteen August 2015). "How 'Playola' Is Infiltrating Streaming Services: Pay for Play Is 'Definitely Happening'". Billboard. Eldridge Industries. Retrieved 30 April 2017.
  99. ^ "Spotify Really, Really, REALLY Wants You lot To Listen To Drake'due south New Anthology". Music Feeds. 1 July 2018. Retrieved 3 July 2018.
  100. ^ "Spotify users demand Drake refunds". BBC News . Retrieved 3 July 2018.
  101. ^ Krukowski, Damon (2 July 2018). "What Information technology Means When Spotify Has Zip to "Recommend" Simply Drake". Pitchfork . Retrieved 22 March 2021.
  102. ^ "Apple Music Is Burdensome Spotify In User Engagement — And the Latest Drake Numbers Prove It". Digital Music News. 2 July 2018. Archived from the original on three July 2018. Retrieved 22 March 2021.
  103. ^ Ingham, Tim (31 Baronial 2016). "Spotify is making its own records... and putting them on playlists". Music Business organization Worldwide . Retrieved 10 July 2017.
  104. ^ Raymond, Adam Yard. (5 July 2017). "The Streaming Problem: How Spammers, Superstars, and Tech Giants Gamed the Music Manufacture". Vulture. New York. Retrieved 10 July 2017.
  105. ^ Gensler, Andy (vii July 2017). "Spotify on Not-Existent Artist Allegations: 'Nosotros Do Not and Have Never Created Faux Artists'". Billboard. Eldridge Industries. Retrieved 10 July 2017.
  106. ^ Ingham, Tim (9 July 2017). "Spotify denies it'southward playlisting imitation artists. So why are all these fake artists on its playlists?". Music Business organization Worldwide . Retrieved 10 July 2017.
  107. ^ "Spotify has removed white ability music from its platform. But it'south still available on dozens of other sites". PBS NewsHour. 18 Baronial 2017.
  108. ^ Strauss, Matthew (10 May 2018). "Spotify Removes R. Kelly and XXXTentacion From Its Playlists". Pitchfork . Retrieved 21 Oct 2018.
  109. ^ Minsker, Evan; Yoo, Noah (1 June 2018). "Spotify Walks Dorsum Controversial "Hateful Comport" Policy, Adds XXXTentacion to Major Playlist". Pitchfork . Retrieved 21 Oct 2018.
  110. ^ Plenty, Maleaha Brings. "Brings Plenty: Spotify removing controversial artists is of import".
  111. ^ Brandle, Lars (five March 2018). "Spotify took the moral loftier ground on R. Kelly & XXXTentacion. Don't exist shocked, this has happened before". The Industry Observer. The Brag Media.
  112. ^ Resnikoff, Paul (6 April 2021). "Spotify Continues to Remove Joe Rogan Episodes — 42 Shows Now Deleted". Digital Music News.
  113. ^ Leyden, John (4 March 2009). "Spotify alienation creates password hack risk". The Annals. Situation Publishing. Retrieved nine June 2017.
  114. ^ Beaumont, Claudine (5 March 2009). "Spotify user data compromised subsequently service hacked". The Daily Telegraph . Retrieved ix June 2017.
  115. ^ Deleon, Nicholas (30 March 2011). "Spotify Becomes Latest High Profile Inadvertent Malware Benefactor". TechCrunch. AOL. Retrieved nine June 2017.
  116. ^ "Spotify ads hit by malware set on". BBC News. BBC. 29 March 2011. Retrieved nine June 2017.
  117. ^ Stål, Oskar (27 May 2014). "Important Notice to Our Users". Spotify. Archived from the original on 18 December 2016. Retrieved sixteen January 2017.
  118. ^ Gibbs, Samuel (28 May 2014). "Spotify hack leads to rollout of new Android app". The Guardian . Retrieved 16 January 2017.
  119. ^ Broida, Rick (1 June 2016). "Block explicit lyrics in music subscription services". CNET. CBS Interactive. Retrieved 22 January 2017.
  120. ^ Maudsley, Dan (23 April 2018). "Spotify tests filter to cake swearing in songs". BBC News.
  121. ^ a b c Welch, Chris (26 May 2017). "It's time for Spotify to stop capping how much music you tin save". The Verge. Vocalisation Media. Retrieved 27 May 2017.
  122. ^ a b Gartenberg, Chaim (26 May 2020). "Spotify finally removes its x,000-vocal library limit". The Verge.
  123. ^ Mead, Derek (31 March 2016). "Spotify Should Spend Its Latest Billion Dollars Fixing Its Dumbest Bug". Motherboard. Vice Media. Retrieved 27 May 2017.
  124. ^ "Spotify users push back at the over-the-top Drake promotion". TechCrunch . Retrieved v February 2020.
  125. ^ Savage, Marking (3 July 2018). "Spotify users need Drake refunds". BBC News . Retrieved 5 February 2020.
  126. ^ Mullin, Joe (4 September 2013). "Spotify sued over user playlists, said to infringe copyright". Ars Technica. Condé Nast. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  127. ^ Dredge, Stuart (four September 2013). "Ministry of Sound sues Spotify for copyright infringement". The Guardian . Retrieved 21 Jan 2017.
  128. ^ Dredge, Stuart (27 February 2014). "Spotify and Ministry of Sound settle music playlists copyright lawsuit". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved v February 2020.
  129. ^ "Spotify and Joe Rogan nether fire over Alex Jones role". BBC News. 29 Oct 2020. Retrieved 29 October 2020.
  130. ^ Tapp, Tom (13 Jan 2022). "Hundreds Of Doctors Sign Open Letter Asking Spotify To Address "Mass Misinformation Events," Take Aim At Joe Rogan's Show". Borderline. Archived from the original on 13 January 2022. Retrieved 13 January 2022.
  131. ^ Dickson, E. J. (12 January 2022). "'A Menace to Public Health': Doctors Demand Spotify Puts an Stop to Covid Lies on 'Joe Rogan Experience'". Rolling Rock. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022. Retrieved 13 January 2022.
  132. ^ Weaver, Jackson (25 January 2022). "Neil Young demands Spotify remove his music over Joe Rogan COVID-19 misinformation". CBC News . Retrieved 25 January 2022.
  133. ^ David, Bauder (26 May 2022). "Spotify says it volition grant Immature's asking to remove music". Associated Printing.
  134. ^ Shafer, Ellise (28 January 2022). "Joni Mitchell Says She's Removing Music From Spotify: 'Irresponsible People Are Spreading Lies'". Diverseness.
  135. ^ Otte, Jedidajah (28 January 2022). "James Edgeless jokes he will release new music on Spotify in Rogan protest". The Guardian.
  136. ^ @JamesBlunt (29 January 2022). "If @spotify doesn't immediately remove @joerogan, I will release new music onto the platform. #youwerebeautiful" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  137. ^ Kreps, Daniel (29 Jan 2022). "Nils Lofgren Pulls Music From Spotify in Solidarity With Neil Young". Rolling Stone. Penske Media Corporation.
  138. ^ Roth, Emma (30 January 2022). "Brené Brown says she won't release new episodes of her Spotify-exclusive podcasts 'until further notice'". The Verge . Retrieved xxx January 2022.
  139. ^ Foster, Max; Cotovio, Vasco; Picheta, Rob (xxx January 2022). "Harry and Meghan express 'concerns' to Spotify over misinformation". CNN . Retrieved 30 January 2022.
  140. ^ "Spotify: Streaming giant announces plans to clamp down on Covid misinformation". BBC News. 30 Jan 2022.
  141. ^ "Daniel Ek puts €100M into defence startup Helsing.ai, to support democracies". TechCrunch. nine November 2021. Retrieved 11 February 2022.
  142. ^ "Spotify cold-shoulder: Daniel Ek's investment in defense tech was the last straw for some artists". Fast Company. 9 December 2021. Retrieved eleven February 2022.
  143. ^ "Daniel Ek, Defense Tech and Why Some Artists Accept Joined a Call to 'Boycott Spotify'". Billboard. 18 Jan 2022. Retrieved 11 Feb 2022.

witherssuldy1984.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Spotify

0 Response to "How to Show the Album Art in Spotify Again"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel